Scrub Caps, Best Zone 1 FDP Techniques, & Fresh Quiz Round

Also: FDP avulsion injury classification, fixing a zone 1 FDP & 3 recommended reads.
Scrub Caps, Best Zone 1 FDP Techniques, & Fresh Quiz Round

In this week's edition

  1. ✍️ Letter from P'Fella
    The scrub cap saga.
  2. 🤓 The Sunday Quiz
    A fresh round starts today!
  3. 🖼️ Image of the Week
    FDP avulsion injury classification.
  4. 🚑 Technique Tip
    How to fix a zone 1 FDP.
  5. 📖 What Does the Evidence Say
    What is the best way to repair a zone 1 FDP?
  6. 🔥 Articles of the Week
    Overview of techniques, anatomical repair, & button vs anchor: With 1-sentence summaries.
  7. 💕 Feedback
    Suggest ideas & give feedback!

A Letter from P'Fella

The Scrub Cap Saga: Sterility or Symbolism?

👋
Every so often, scrub caps resurface on Twitter. Bouffant vs. skullcap. Cloth vs. disposable. Studies get posted, jokes are made, and the conclusion is always the same: there’s no difference in infection rates.

The point isn’t whether scrub caps have a role — they do. The point is how quickly a simple, practical measure turns into dogma. Instead of “keep hair out of the sterile field,” it becomes a war of fabrics and policies, written and enforced as if one type of cap is the savior of patient safety.

A Familiar Pattern

We’ve seen this before. Disposable jackets? Millions spent, zero effect. The real issues, like hand hygiene, teamwork, and trainee exposure, remain untouched, while caps and coats get policed like the frontlines of infection control. It’s a comfortable kind of distraction.

The Metaphor We Wear

Scrub caps remind us that surgery often runs on inherited rules. Policies get handed down, enforced, and rarely questioned. A small practical truth (“hair sheds”) becomes inflated into ritual, tradition, and paperwork. It’s not about the hat. It’s about how we make decisions.

With love,
P’Fella ❤️

The Sunday Quiz

A Fresh Round Starts Today!

Ready to climb the leaderboard?

Join The Weekly Quiz in each edition of thePlasticsPaper. This is the first round of seven rounds!

The top scorer wins one our Foundations textbook at a discount!

Image of the Week

FDP Injury Classification

🖼️
Image of the Week

This week's image outlines the Leddy and Packer classification of flexor digitorum profundus (FDP) avulsion injuries, originally divided into three types. These injury types describe the level of tendon retraction, presence of bony fragments, and status of the vincula, which are key for planning surgical repair.

I: Tendinous avulsion, vinculum disrupted, retraction into the palm.
II: Tendinous avulsion, intact vinculum, retraction to PIPJ.
III: Bony avulsion, retraction to A4 pulley.

Later additions include,
IV: Combined bony and tendinous avulsion with distal phalanx fracture at A4 pulley.
V: Intra-articular bony avulsion with extra-articular fracture.
Type VI: FDP avulsion with concurrent FDS rupture, likely from FDP entrapment at Camper’s chiasm, causing secondary FDS avulsion.

FDP Avulsion Injury Classification
FDP Avulsion Injury Classification

Technique Tip

How to Fix a Zone 1 FDP

🚑
Technique Tip of the Week

A lateral oblique transosseous technique using Kirschner wires offers an anatomical and reliable method for zone I FDP tendon reinsertion. In a study of 18 patients, this approach showed 14 good-to-excellent outcomes, with no reported ruptures and minimal morbidity, making it a simple, low-profile alternative to suture anchors or pull-out buttons.

What Does the Evidence Say?

The Best Way to Repair a Zone 1 FDP

In this section, we dive deep into the latest research and evidence on medical practices and surgical techniques.

Zone 1 flexor digitorum profundus (FDP) repair techniques have evolved to address the challenges of achieving strong tendon-bone attachment while minimizing complications. Chu et al. (2013) demonstrated that an all-inside suture technique, where the FDP tendon is attached to bone with two 3-0 Ethibond sutures tied over the dorsal distal phalanx, showed no significant biomechanical differences compared to traditional pull-out suture and suture anchor repairs in terms of tensile stiffness, ultimate load, and work to failure. This technique avoids external buttons and anchor costs.

Cogswell (2014) described a simplified adaptation where sutures are passed through the FDP tendon and tied over the distal phalanx tip, supplemented with volar epitendinous repair.

The Mantero technique, as reported by Guinard et al. (1999), achieved 23 excellent to good results in 24 cases with active mobilization protocols. For complex cases involving bony avulsion fractures, Nho et al. (2018) introduced a combined approach using both suture anchors and miniscrews to enhance repair strength.

Articles of the Week

3 Interesting Articles with One-Sentence Summaries

Which Zone 1 Repair Technique Works Best? (Boyce, 2013)

No single repair method for Zone 1 FDP avulsions (button pullout, internal sutures, or bone anchors) shows clear superiority, with outcomes and complication rates remaining similar across techniques.

How Effective Is Anatomical Zone 1 FDP Repair? (Teo, 2009)

Transosseous modified Kessler repairs for Zone 1 FDP injuries achieved excellent/good outcomes in 78% of patients with zero tendon ruptures over 8 months, demonstrating strong functional results and low morbidity.

Button vs. Anchor in Zone 1 FDP Repair (Payne, 2022)

Bone anchor repair achieved good function in 95% of patients versus 41% with button-over-nail, with roughly half the complication rate, showing superior motion, safety, and early outcomes at 12 weeks.

Feedback

I hope you enjoyed it 😄


About the author
PlasticsFella

One platform for everything
Plastic Surgery

A curated suite of educational tools designed specifically for the evidence-based Plastic Surgeon.

Go Pro with a Free Trial

Great! You’ve successfully signed up.

Welcome back! You've successfully signed in.

You've successfully subscribed to thePlasticsFella.

Success! Check your email for magic link to sign-in.

Success! Your billing info has been updated.

Your billing was not updated.